An eulogy for pots [1]
Deborah Dorotinsky
Alperstein [2]
DOROTINSKY ALPERSTEIN, Deborah. An eulogy for pots. 19&20,
Rio de Janeiro, v. X, n. 2, jul./dez. 2015. https://www.doi.org/10.52913/19e20.X2.08b
[Español]
* *
*
1.
On May
11th, 1910, the Board of the National School of Arts and Crafts for Men (ENAOH)
in Mexico City received a letter signed by the Undersecretary of Public
Instruction and Fine Arts, Ezequiel A. Chavez, notifying that the minister of
that department, Justo Sierra, had already approved the sketches for the oil
paintings commissioned to Mr. Saturnino Herrán
and that they should be placed in the School’s Auditorium: “This Secretariat is
pleased to authorize Mr. Saturnino Herrán to decorate the panneaux
of the Auditorium of the School under your direction, once the sketches of the
respective compositions have been already approved by this same Secretariat” [Figure 1 and Figure 2].[3] Three months later, on August 12th, 1910, the Board of
the School notified the Secretary of Education and Fine Arts that Herrán’s commission was concluded, to the Board’s
satisfaction. The painter himself valued both works at $1,500 pesos.[4]
They were two mural oil paintings, executed directly on a plastered wall,
symmetrically decorating the ends of the Auditorium’s front wall.[5]
The works which finally came to be executed [Figure
3 and Figure 4] differ from the preparatory sketches, the spaces
painted in its base are absent - maybe allowing a possible inclusion of some
text or sign - as well as other minor changes, as discussed below.
2.
Herrán
delivered the works a few months before the outbreak of the Revolution and,
apparently, he was paid only a third of what had been promised. If we follow
Fausto Ramirez’s interpretation on Herrán’s work - as
surpassing the academic realism in which the painter was trained, connected
with the Symbolist movement consolidated in Mexico by Julio Ruelas, and
understanding such Symbolism in an original way, adapting his themes according
to experience of that which is “national” - we suggest that the frequent
presence of local ceramic in his production goes beyond a decorative aim. By
translating experiences and individual views of what is one’s own, it acquires
the value of being deeply rooted in the land, preceding the assessment
traditional art gained during the post-revolutionary period, after 1920.[6]
The predominating principle in the historiographical discourse of Modern Mexican
art is that popular art suddenly “seemed to have been reassessed” at the time
of the so-called cultural renaissance. However, as shown by the two works by Herrán we will examine herein - as well as other works by
the same artist or by artists like Félix Parra and
German Gedovius - the local contemporary pottery was
not a discovery of the post-revolutionary vanguards, neither as local objects,
nor as objects with formal qualities worth considering as imaginative creation.
3.
Historiography
has long ago acknowledged the presence of pre-Columbian indigenous art in the
19th century’s Fine Arts in Mexico as an appropriation of the material culture
of the past, and as a way to build a national identity
rooted in its own “tradition”. Art historians such as Fausto Ramirez, Angelica
Velazquez, Esther Acevedo and Elena Estrada Gerlero
have approached historical painting and landscape painting in their
“antiquarian” aspect.[7] A glance at the catalogue raissonné of the National Museum of Art (MUNAL) and the
third volume of the catalogue of the exhibition Los pinceles
de la Historia (“History’s paintbrushes”) presented in the museum reveals
the depth with which they have dealt with the presence of historical indigenous
characters, monoliths, sculptures, reliefs, pseudo-prehispanic
architectural structures and figurines of varied nature as these, which are
also depicted in the 19th century painting. Pre-Hispanic art appears also in
the plates of different Atlases, such as in those by Garcia Cubas,
and in monumental publications such as México a través
de los siglos.[8] But to account
for certain visual habits of the 19th century concerning appropriation,
incorporation, citation or relying on the traditional arts - with which they
possibly tried to make sense of the otherness of the indigenous worlds,
contemporary both to the artists and to the Mexican society undergoing
modernization - we have to look at minor genres in painting such as still life,
documentary photographs in albums and isolated episodes in historical and
landscape paintings, as well as in some allegoriesin
if we are to find references to those objects of indigenous origin. The works
of Saturnino Herrán here at
issue witness the encounter between an emerging modernity seen through the
building of a new city, a still present handicraft tradition, and social values
such as the family and the physical health of the male body
which, despite existing since the Porfiriato,
acquired other dimensions during the post-revolution.
Herrán, the Allegory of Construction, and the Allegory
of Labour
4.
To
improve the industry’s condition after independence, various efforts were made
to offer workers a more specialized training in the use of the rapidly changing
technologies. The ENAOH’s closest direct precedent can be dated as January
14th, 1856, when President Comonfort decreed the
establishment of an Industrial School of Arts and Crafts, allocating to it a
lot of land in San Jacinto. The School founded by Comonfort was a reference in 1867 during the Restored
Republic and, by order of President Benito Juarez, the building of the former
convent of San Lorenzo was allotted to the National School of Arts and Crafts
for Men. Dr. Miguel Hurtado was the ENOAH’s first headmaster, in office until
1877. Also, in 1867, a new Law of Education was enacted aspiring to offer
education to the most disadvantaged social sectors. The new academic proposals
that emerged from that law aimed at preparing children and youngsters for their
inclusion in an economically active life. In 1877, the engineer Manuel Alvarez
was appointed director of the ENAOH; he was replaced in 1905 by engineer
Gonzalo Garita, who made the reform of the school’s
study plan in 1907. According to Humberto Monteón,
between 1889 and 1905, the arrival of modern machinery and industrial
production processes augmented, increasing the demand for skilled industrial
workers. At the end of 1890, the Escuela
Práctica de Maquinistas (EPM,
Practical School of Machinists) was established, with the aim of creating
specialized technical staff, in particular for
handling equipment such as steam engines. In 1892, the EPM was transferred to
the ENAOH, where a large part of locomotive drivers and several metalworkers
were trained. Consequently, the call for training craftsmen gradually gave
space to the training of workers qualified in handling modern machinery. Finally,
towards 1915, the ENAOH was transformed into the Escuela Práctica de Ingenieros Mecánicos y Electricistas (Practical School of Mechanical and Electrical
Engineers), and later into the Escuela
Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Electrica (ESIME, Superior Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
School).[9]
Herrán painted these two works at the time of this
particular transition at the ENAOH, so the tension between the two allegories,
between an image of a craftsman and that of an industrial worker is not
accidental.
5.
As
mentioned above, it was the Minister of Education and Fine Arts of the
government of Porfirio Diaz, Justo Sierra, who directly commissioned both “panneaux” to Saturnino Herrán in order to decorate the
Auditorium and who also approved the preparatory sketches.
6.
Regarding the document the Secretariat
under your worthy assignment, reference number 516, dated last May 11th, I have
the honour to inform you that, to the satisfaction of
this Board, Mr. Saturnino Herrán
has concluded the oil paintings for decorating the panneaux
of this School’s Auditorium, in accordance with the sketches of the respective
compositions approved by that Superior service.
7.
At the same time, I allow myself to
express that Mr. Herrán has priced the paintings in
question at the sum of $1,500.00¢, a thousand and five hundred pesos, so that
the same Secretariat can designate to which expenditure budget item the payment
of the aforementioned amount should be charged.[10]
8.
The
details of the restoration of these works that received little attention by art
criticism are quite particular. According to the record preserved in the
National Registration Centre for Conservation and Artistic Heritage of the
National Institute of Fine Arts (CENCROPAM), the then National Centre for
Conservation of Artistic Works (CNCOA) Thomas Zurián
Ugarte, its director, began in 1973 the proceedings to retrieve and restore two
mural paintings by Saturnino Herrán.
These were in very poor condition in the semi-destroyed Auditorium of the
former National School of Arts and Crafts for Men (ENAOH), then Superior
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering School (ESIME), dependent on the National
Polytechnic Institute.[11] In another document, dated June 28th,
1974, the director of CNCOA notified the head of the Department of Visual Arts
of the National Institute of Fine Arts, the architect Felipe Lacoture Fornell, that they had
returned to inspect the condition of the mural paintings and that they had
found them even more damaged. He therefore requested urgent support so as to pressure the authorities of the Board of the
National Polytechnic Institute into allowing the CNCOA staff to proceed with
the repair and restoration of these murals. Unfortunately, Prof. Zurián received no answer and in another letter addressed
to the architect Lacouture in January 1975, he
reported that nothing had been done concerning the conditions of Herrán’s mural paintings, and that due to an overt and
irreversible deterioration process, the removal of those paintings was
extremely urgent. Consequently, it was imperative to contact the
representatives of the Board of the Department of Planning and Programming
Works of the IPN, because as far as they had been informed, the responsibility
for covering the cost of removal, retrieval and restoration was the aforementioned IPN unit.
9.
In
February 1975, the architect Juan Antonio Vargas Garcia of the IPN Board
finally replied to architect Lacouture saying that
the CNCOA staff would take care of preparing the budget for the repair. This
detailed budget should be sent to the architect Reynaldo Perez Rayon, General
Director of the IPN’s Works and Facilities Board.
10.
On
June 2nd, 1975, Prof. Zurián sends to IPN’s architect
Reynaldo Perez Rayon the CNCOA document nº 671, with appendixes detailing the
procedures to be followed for the mural’s removal from the walls. The document
was stamped when it was received at the IPN on June 3rd, 1975. The budget for
the black and white photographic documentation, consolidation
and restoration for 1975 was $27.819 Mexican pesos: $6469.50 concerning
material and $21.819 for the wages of two technicians.
11.
By
October 1975, the works had not yet begun and, according to what Prof. Zurián, from the CNCOA, informed the architect Reynaldo
Perez Rayon, from the IPN, the cost had risen to $100,000 pesos. In 1976,
cheques were issued for the beginning of the removal, transportation to CNCOA
and restoration of the murals. Unfortunately, the restorers faced an obstacle
again, as they were now denied access to the auditorium by the ESIME
authorities. According to other documents in the file, the contract concerning
the tasks of removal, transfer to CNCOA and restoration had been signed in
January 1976, although it was not until February 1977 that the transfer to the
CNCOA of the already removed murals was finally authorized. The records of the
arrival of the murals details them as Albañiles
(“Builders”) and Albores (“Dawn”), being the latter
probably a typing error in the transcription of the title Labores
(“Labours”).
12.
While
the murals were being restored at the CNCOA, the Government of the state of
Aguascalientes and the INBA requested them on loan for an exhibition in 1978.
Apparently, this is the reason why the works travelled to Aguascalientes, the
birthplace of Saturnino Herrán,
were exhibited, and presumably remained there until 1992.[12]
In the course of the proceedings for the loan of the murals to the government
of the state of Aguascalientes, these works were registered with the titles of
“Allegory of Construction” and “Allegory of Labour”, as
they are known today. These murals were wrongly dated as between 1911 and 1914,
an error corrected herein with the discovery of the documents signed by Justo
Sierra, commissioning Herrán to decorate the
auditorium of what, in 1910, was still the National School of Arts and Crafts
for Men.
13.
Let us
look at both paintings in order to to begin to
understand the way in which tradition and modernization are tensioned [Figure
3 and Figure 4].[13]
14.
In the
foreground of both “panneaux”, Herrán
disposed three figures. On the left panel, “Allegory of Construction”, we see a
stocky man with the strap of his denim overall hanging from his semi-naked
torso. In his right hand he is holding a brush, while in the left one he is
holding a large green-glazed ceramic pot, which he is
presumably about to decorate. On the right panel, “Allegory of Labour”, there is an upside-down pot and a woman with two
toddlers. These figures in the foreground of both works might represent the
nuclear family. The woman’s bare shoulder emphasizes the fact that she was
breastfeeding. The backgrounds in both panels depict naked-torso workers with
an agile and slender musculature, carrying stones and lifting pots or barrels
with sand. In “Allegory of Construction”, an Ionic capital on a column replaces
the pilaster in the preliminary sketch.[14] In the middleground,
towards the left side, the figures of five labourers
at work are set in an upward sequence so as to
indicate the rising of the construction. In “Allegory of Labour”,
towards the left edge, an open-air oven evokes the one used for the firing
pieces of pottery like the ones dominating the foreground of both paintings.
Behind the woman with the infants, in the middleground,
crowded to the right, there is also a compact group of workers. One of them is
wearing a hat and a bushy moustache, possibly the engineer or the foreman.
Three figures are seen behind him; two are clearly young workers with bare
torsos, and the third one, with a hardly distinguishable outline, also seems to
be nude from the waist up. Finally, in both paintings, the yellow, green and
violet-coloured blurred backgrounds reveal the
ambiguous spaces where construction and labour take
place.
15.
In the
background of “Allegory of Construction”, at the right and bathed by a
yellow-purplish light, stands a building with the skeleton of a wooden
scaffold. In “Allegory of Labour”, almost at the centre of the painting, we can distinguish two more men
toiling under the sun, exposing their arms and backs. Herrán
has treated both paintings like a chiaroscuro; he has left the foreground in
the shadow, clarifying and illuminating the work as we
move towards the background.
16.
The
structure of the composition is similar on both of their sides, although the
rhythm of ascent and descent is inverted so as to
emphasize a unity and maybe to suggest the complementarity of the works. At the
outer edges of both panels the figures of humans, buildings and construction
elements almost split the work vertically from the top corners towards the centre, and
turning the midpoint of the mural into the apex of an inverted and truncated
triangle. The background of “Allegory of Construction” is filled by the
structures of two scaffolded buildings; one is smaller, closer to the workers
and in backlight, while the other one is bathed in a bluish glow. In “Allegory
of Labour”, in the background landscape, where the labour takes place, there is a cart with big wheels;
further back, smoke curling from the chimney of a factory closes the background
view. The presence of pottery in both foregrounds, together with the yellow,
green, violet and bluish coloured
backgrounds, unify and give continuity to the pair of paintings.[15]
Both foreground and background compress the figures of the sensual workers,
framing and highlighting them, celebrating work as a human labour.
17.
Herrán
had already addressed the issue of labour in an
earlier work, signed in 1908 and awarded with the ENBA grant to Europe the
following year, which he declined in order to be able
to stay in Mexico. The work was entitled “Labour” [Figure
5], a large format
landscape painting in which the three figures of a nuclear family stand out,
the mother, breastfeeding, with her chest uncovered, the father, tenderly
stroking the infant’s head; behind them, a compact group of men moving a big boulder.
This painting was well-received by the critics, and in the words of a columnist
of El Imparcial,
18.
This young painter is only 21 years old,
but he is already one of the Academy’s most advanced and talented [students],
one could not judge him too harshly in this painting as it’s his first serious
work [...] The distinctive qualities of his work are a good composition and
fairness in the masses of chiaroscuro, which adjust to an essentially
decorative criteria.[16]
19.
As
revealed by the title of the article in El Imparcial,
“The Department of Education has acquired a painting by S. Herrán.
Honourable distinction to a student of Fine Arts”,
the “Labour” painting was acquired by Justo Sierra,
Secretary of Education and Fine Arts, for the San Carlos Academy. Almost a year
later, the Secretary had commissioned the decorative panels on labour for the ENAOH. The newspaper El Mundo Ilustrado insisted that Saturnino
Herrán was “much more than a promise. He is already
an artist, and as an artist he works and studies, in such a way that every
effort of his reveals an improvement...”.[17]
This painting, like the one we are analysing herein,
structurally combines the theme of the nuclear family and the one of heavy labour. In 1910, Herrán handed
the “panneaux” to the National School of Arts and
Crafts for Men (ENAOH), a few months before the outbreak of the Revolution and
around the date when the students of the National
School of Fine Arts (San Carlos Academy) exhibited their works during the
School’s celebrations for the centennial of Independence. We know that, in this
event, the painter exhibited the triptych “The Legend of Volcanoes” [see Image], as narrated by art critiques, as well as a
disturbing piece showing the weariness of labour -
and not its heroic exaltation - “Women selling pots”.[18]
Both “Labour” and the triptych “The Legend of
Volcanoes” received positive media attention. However, the press clippings do
not refer to the preparatory studies commissioned by Justo Sierra, probably not
exhibited at the time. Fausto Ramirez reminds us that towards 1909, while still
attending Composition in Painting lessons, Herrán was
appointed as temporary professor in the day-course of
drawing from plaster.[19]
20.
There
is an important connection between “Labour” and the
two allegories we are here working with. At first glance, Herrán
has treated the different planes in the three pieces with a similar
chiaroscuro; the foreground is darker, while the middle and background
progressively gain light and colour, becoming more
luminous. But that is not all. Possibly the same sketches and the same models
were used in the three paintings. For example, in “Labour”
the workers are dragging a block of marble, and in “Allegory of Construction”
one of the workers is carrying a more manageable piece while further down we
find the result of the already worked material, the Ionic capital of the
pillar. Also, in “Labour”, the position of one of the
workers seems to be inverted in the centre of the
background of “Allegory of Labour”. However, there
are also clear differences. Besides being more naturalist, “Labour”
seems more finished, while the two allegories that here concern us are much more sketchy. In addition, it is remarkable how in the two
allegories the painter experiments with complementary colours,
yellow and violet, red and green, and with the outline of certain parts in red
and black forms, that he almost delineates against the background [Figure 3, details]. The colouring draws much
attention, and it should be noted that the reproductions of these two
allegories do not do justice to the original colours,
because in most of them they have been reproduced closer to ochre tones, losing
their intensity and brightness, dulling the strange optical effect achieved by
complementary colours. Another work exhibited in 1910
at the Academy which also presents this problem is Lavando las ollas (“Washing the pots”), also known as Las vendedoras de ollas (“The pot sellers”) or Vendedoras
de ollas (“Women selling pots”) [Figure
6], today in the Museum
of Aguascalientes collection; as well as the painting La Cosecha (“Harvest”),
today in Andrés Blaistein’s collection.[20]
21.
The
study plan of academic activities of the School of Arts and Crafts for Men,
published in 1907, recommends three weekly lectures on Moral and Health for all
students in the fourth year, and physical education exercises in every year in
school.[21] So, apparently, Herrán
responds with the good physical health of the men in his paintings to the
desire to provide the disadvantaged population with healthy bodies, which, in
turn, would produce healthy minds. The visual elaboration of the hygienist
premises founded in the Porfiriato and strengthened
and expanded by the education programs of the revolutionary governments is,
therefore, already visible in this work.[22]
We also see, as Raquel Tibol asserts, that Herrán approves of labour, that
the “good worker” is simultaneously a good father and good husband, and “with
his strong arms the Mexican family will develop healthily”.[23]
22.
The
first article of the 1907 School’s study plan specifies that “carpentry,
ironworks, turnery, stone masonry, foundry, industrial and decorative painting
and industrial decorative sculpture, electricity applied to industry and
mechanics applied to the industry” would be taught there.[24]
Pottery, whose presence is so prominent in Herrán’s
mural, was not among the subjects offered in the programs. However, industrial
decorative painting was included and it may be
synthetized in the figure of the worker holding the green-glazed pot in one
hand and a paintbrush in the other. So was stone masonry, which in these works
is represented by the stone block carried by the worker in “Allegory of
Construction”, as well as by the Ionic capital of the pillar at his feet. The
same can be said about the marble block carried by the workers in “Labour”. What Herrán shows us in
these works is possibly related to a previous School’s Study plan, the one of
1875, when the ENAOH opened a pottery workshop.[25]
23.
Perhaps
the closest antecedent to this type of decorative allegorical images within
educational facilities is the mural in the National Preparatory School made by
Juan Cordero in 1874.[26] Since it was destroyed around 1900,
according to some sources, it is doubtful that Herrán
would have known it since he was still living in Aguascalientes at that time.[27]
In his allegory, Cordero pairs Science to Fine Arts, and presents them with the
Classicism required by the visual canon current in 1870. Herrán
addressed the issue in a more experimental and decorative way, although his
approach is more pragmatic and naturalist. As far as the theme is concerned,
there are no general allusions to the ideological relationship between science
and art aiming at overcoming envy and ignorance in the works of Herrán, as there are in Cordero’s work. Herrán
addresses the performance of the subject-worker straightforwardly and in
action; in the work that edifies one’s soul and builds the city brings
improvement, development and progress, as proclaimed
and certainly experienced in different aspects in Mexico during the Porfiriato.
24.
Some
of the buildings rising in Mexico City during those years, such as the National
Theatre (nowadays Palace of Fine Arts) [Figure 7] and the Legislative Palace (nowadays the Monument to
the Revolution), are to be seen in the photos of both building processes
preserved in different collections such as the one of the Palace of Fine Arts.
In them we see the wooden scaffolding listed at the bottom of the composition
“Allegory of Construction”. By this I am putting forward that rather than
reporting the construction of this or that specific property, the painter
records the city’s extensive construction labour.
25.
This
theme of building the modern city can be appreciated in several works of Latin
American and European artists, in which efforts are combined to provide a
high-spirited image of work. The case of Pio Collivadino
in Argentina is exemplary. As Claudia Shmidt
explains, Collivadino “accompanied throughout his
life the processes of dramatic transformation experienced by the city”,[28] intensely
appreciated in his two brief trips of 1898 and 1905 during his journey around
Italy that began in 1890 and was concluded sixteen years later. The art historian
Laura Malosetti says that Collivadino
was responsible for conveying urban landscape to Easel Painting and turning the
subject into a “commendable subject to be honoured by
painting”[29]. In the catalogue accompanying the exhibition
“Collivadino: Buenos Aires in Construction” curated
by Malosetti in 2013 there are several works of other
artists who not by chance maintain an interesting connection with that mixture
of practices seen as more traditional and less industrialized (the use of
horses to pull the load, as in the cart of Herran’s
work) and the booming construction of the city. A case in point is Alberto
Maria Rossi’s work “The city emerges” (1930) or Collivadino’s
“The bank of Boston or the Northern Diagonal” (1926), where the skeleton of a
building in progress can be clearly seen.
26.
Meanwhile,
the preliminary studies conducted by Henrique Bernardelli around
1923 to decorate the Club of Engineers and the Ministry of Aviation are of
significant value; sheltered in Mariano Procopio’s Museum and the Pinacoteca de
São Paulo, the Brazilian researcher Arthur Valle has recently writte about them in an exhibition catalogue.[30]
In these studies, which are also more academically connected to the allegorical
genre due to its emblematic characters floating in the cloudscape, we see a man
sitting on a steel beam while an airplane crosses the sky and Icarus plunges
hopelessly, or a Pegasus running next to a locomotive on a steel bridge.[31]
27.
This
concern with showing progress was merged with the interest of developing
appropriate decorative contents, as well as descriptive, didactic
and edifying ones for public spaces such as exhibition halls. Concerning this,
five years before Herrán handed over the “panneaux” to the ENAOH, the magazine The Studio:
International Art published an article about the England salon at
the biennial exhibition in Venice in 1903.[32]
The English painter Frank Brangwyn was responsible for the decoration of the
space. Two of the works by this English artist which were reproduced in the
magazine [Figures 8a and 8b] certainly remind us of Herrán’s
work, so it is possible to speculate that the Mexican painter had seen them in
that publication. Fausto Ramirez had already indicated that Jorge Useta, Herrán’s colleague at the
National School of Fine Arts, had stated that Herrán’s
early work showed the influence of Brangwyn, maybe due to Herrán’s
liking of this English painter’s trichromatic works in the ENBA’s library.[33]
28.
In two
of the painted panels reproduced in The Studio, Brangwyn achieves a
chiaroscuro that distinguishes the figures in the foreground - which are darker
and more naturalistic - from the ones in the background, more diffuse in their
definition and more luminous, as the allegories we are herein
dealing with. Both of Brangwyn’s paintings depict workers in the foreground: in
one they insinuate pottery’s manual work and in the other, industrial work. On
the right side of the one dedicated to pottery, craftsmen are carrying earthen
pots that function as a kind of “repoussoir”, while
on the lower part of the left side, there is smoke venting from chimneys of
which are possibly ceramic kilns. In the work dedicated to industrial work, the
bodies of the blacksmiths are more massive and nude from the waist upwards,
like in the allegories we are reviewing.
Pots in costumbrista painting
29.
According
to the researcher Leonor Cortina, two different and prevailing traditions can
be identified in the Mexican pottery and faience production in the 19th
century: one closer to a Hispanic origin, the Puebla earthenware, usually
called “Talavera de Puebla”; and the other, closer to an indigenous origin from
two locations near the city of Guadalajara, Tlaquepaque and Tonala,
important pottery production centres since
pre-Hispanic times. This earthenware, including the one known as scented-earthenware, “because of the freshness and delicious
taste they provided to the water contained in their demijohn’s”,[34]
were used locally and exported to Europe. Gustavo Curiel tells us that to get
an idea of the esteem Mexican earthenware had in Europe since the
17th century one should take a look at, for example, the Tlaquepaque pitcher
one of the Infants offers to the other in “Las Meninas” by Velázquez.[35]
The appreciation of this kind of pottery achieved strange proportions due to the
fact that Spanish ladies, and even nuns, used to eat the ceramic. In the 17th
century this phenomenon was called bucarophagy.[36]
30.
Alexander
von Humboldt, who visited the new continent two decades before other Europeans,
includes in his Political essay on the
kingdom of New Spain a reference to Hernán
Cortés; therefore, written records about the admiration caused by Mexican
pottery can be found since the 16th century. In a letter from January 30th,
1520, Cortés writes to Emperor Charles V about the objects that were sold in
México-Tenochtitlan: “They sell a lot of pottery that is mainly of a good kind;
they sell many vessels, large jars and small jars, pots, bricks, and other
infinite kinds of vessels, all of a remarkable clay: all or almost all of them
glazed and painted...”.[37] As explained by Leonor Cortina, pottery
came in different qualities and although the most exquisite pieces were
acquired by the wealthy classes who even travelled overseas, pieces of lower
quality could be acquired by members of the lower class. An example of this is
seen in a casta painting by Spanish painter Francisco
Clapera (ca.1790) [Figure
9]; as explained by
Gustavo Curiel and Antonio Rubial, along with the
local economic activity and racial classification, objects of everyday life are
depicted, such as the bundle rolled up in a corner, and the simple wooden
cupboard that leans against the wall with a “scented-pot of burnished red clay
of Tlaquepaque”, and other faience and glass objects on the wall, “framing the
cupboard, hanging, there are more pieces of burnished red clay, two silver
flasks, besides indispensable skillet for tortillas”.[38]
31.
The
presence of the scented vases in these works of the 18th century is extremely
important to complete the ceramic typologies of Tlaquepaque, because as the
investigators tell us, there are shapes of pieces “documented” in the paintings
that do not exist even in the collection of the Countess of Oñate,
considered one of the most complete ones, which is now in the Museum of America
in Spain.
32.
The
burnished red ware continues to be acknowledged in many works of costumbrista painting in the 19th century and especially
towards the mid-century, at the end of Romanticism. Ceramics appears as part of
a daily life represented in certain conditions of what is typical; be it in the
hands of one of the “popular types”, as shown in the works by Johann Solomon Heggi, Edouard Pingret and Miguel
Mata y Reyes, or in domestic interiors and especially in kitchens, as shown in
other works by Pingret, or in scenes of a more
overtly nationalistic character, as in the anonymous work attributed to Manuel
Serrano known as “Indigenous of the Sierra of Oaxaca”, today in the collection
of the Museum of America in Madrid.[39] In the case of costumbrismo,
the small pots function as expressions of local colour,
just like the baskets, clothes and other body adornments. Although not
indigenous in a purist sense, they are quite common objects and often
characterize lower-class people. Guillermo Prieto reminds us of the presence of
this pottery in places such as the real old-fashioned popular taverns (pulquerias de “rumbo y trueno”).
33.
Imagine a shed, fifty yards long by
fifteen or twenty wide, with its palm or wooden tiled
roof, with no frills or gadgets ... Two yards away from the rear wall, and
facing the front of the galley, a proud row of narrow pulque barrels are in
display, wide in the base, more than two feet high, painted with gaudy colours on the outside and some rubrics that were really
hair-rising, such as the “The do not stretch me” [La no me estires],
“The Brave One” [El valiente], “The Currutaca” [La Currutaca], “The
Delightful One” [El Bonito], etc.
34.
On the border of the barrels and on the
wall’s side, on the wide planks forming a ledge, there are porous clay bowls,
small vessels made of the same material, green glass pitchers of more than a
third of a foot, showing a screw in its relief; small and handy barrels and
casks with their padlock for the distribution to the masters’ house.[40]
35.
Still
life and dining-room paintings which show an eclecticism or “miscegenation”
that were much more manifest together with European-made, westernized,
orientalist and indigenous items, deserve a special mention. Jose Agustin
Arrieta, a 19th-century painter from Puebla, is perhaps the best-known exponent
of this genre. In his paintings we find examples of a harmonious coexistence
between faience of European and Tlaquepaque, Tonala
and Puebla origin, together with local natural products such as mangoes,
pumpkins, prickly pears, avocados, bananas, tomatoes
and baskets. Even artists like Eulalia Lucio, noted for her still life
paintings, emphasize the local character that the most indigenous pottery
connoted.[41]
The urge for decorativism
36.
Going
back to our mural and to the large clay pots painted by Herrán,
however, it must be clarified that their presence is not an isolated and unique
case in his work. Examples abound in his painting, such as in “Labour”, “Women selling pots”, “Herlinda”, “The one from
San Luis”, and “Estefania”, in which the artist has given pottery a significant
place in order to characterize, in my opinion, the
spirit “of the land” of his models. Other works by the painter, such as some
still lifes with small pots, refer to products of a
more local character; cempasúchil flowers, pumpkin
flowers, corn. These works also tell us about the education he received in the
ornamental painting classes at the Academy, as a student of German Gedovius, and other teachers such as Felix Parra, whose
flower arrangements are also preserved in the collection of the National Bank
Mexico.
37.
Ethnographic
photography is also concerned with the recording of pottery production, such as
some photographs taken by Nicolas Leon,[42] one of the founders of the Department of
Physical Anthropology and Ethnography of the National Museum in the 20th
century, during his stay among the Popolocas Indians
in the states of Oaxaca and Veracruz, or others gathered by Constantine Rickards
- British consul in Mexico and the state of Oaxaca - in an unpublished album on
the Oaxacan Indians.[43] In photographs published in the Annals
of the National Museum album, Nicolas Leon includes the usual photograph,
taken frontwards and with a neutral wall in the background, a substitute for
the anthropometric identification photography. But he also registers indigenous
women at work, as in this image of a potter [Figura
10].
38.
He
also took photographs of archaeological pieces, displayed against backgrounds
that isolate them and thus, enhancing their formal qualities and some of its
details, such as sgrafitto. Meanwhile, Rickards
obtained a lot of pictures taken among the Oaxacan Indians for a book which had
been devised and typed, but never published. Several of them include pots and
small pots as part of the characterization of ethnicity [Figures
11a and 11b]. Comparing the
proportion of the pottery production in these images taken in Atzompa, Oaxaca, probably dated between 1900 and 1930, we
realize that Rickards’s album records a more industrial process, or a more
considerable production than that recorded by Nicolas Leon. The green-glazed
earthenware identified in Herrán’s mural probably
comes from this Oaxacan village.
39.
Let us
now try to close our argument with a historiographical reflection. Fausto
Ramirez, who has given us the best development of the arts in Mexico in the
long 19th century and who best knows Herrán’s work,
notes in his Chronicle of the visual arts in the Lopez Velarde years
1914-1921 that, prior to the Muralist movement and the so-called Cultural
Renaissance, “the concern of the education authorities with rethinking the
place and objectives of artistic work in the Mexican society, and with opening
new paths for it” was being discussed in the capital’s press.[44]
Examples of this are the aforementioned changes in the ENAOH study plan and in
the laws of Public Education. This concern with popular production was clearly
shown at the Exhibition of Handicraft Labours and
Fine Arts, in the Spanish Pavilion, opened in the second half of April 1914.[45]
According to Ramirez, José Juan Tablada was the one
who best understood the “conceptual novelty of the exhibition” that showed
works of art together with production of decorative arts and other manual labours. But even before 1914, Herrán
had assimilated colonial art as well as the typical industries and
pre-Columbian indigenous images, particularly since 1910, when he started to
participate as a draftsman in the excavations at Teotihuacan. As proposed by
Fausto Ramirez, Herrán, guided by a Symbolist
inspiration, passed from an external and anecdotal interpretation of both the
figures and the pre-Hispanic vestiges, to an interpretation from within. The
same happened with objects of the indigenous material culture, such as the pots
praised by Herrán in the allegories discussed herein,
and elsewhere in his work. Ramirez clearly states that concerning the colonial
and pre-Hispanic elements in Herrán’s work, “they
serve as receptacles, as the trigger of unique experiences, of creative
subjectivism. The ancient sculptures eventually become”, as happened with the Coatlicue in the mural project To Our Gods, “a
figurative system capable of supporting an interpretation of the historical
experience from within, a symbol of profound reality that was at the same time
national and personal”.[46] Local pottery plays the role deeply
linked to an “origin in these lands” and, thus, transcends its purely
decorative function. Of almost a religious feeling, this intuition of being men
made of the clay of this land can also be glimpsed in the “Ex-voto to Lopez
Velarde”, a poem José Juan Tablada dedicated to the
poet - also a close friend of Herrán’s - at his death
in 1921,
40.
Y tu poesía que dijeron rara,
41.
Rezumando emoción
es agua clara
42.
En botellones de
Guadalajara.
43.
(Pues con sudor de su
barro mortal
44.
cuaja el poeta prismas de cristal
45.
para que el vulgo vea el triste mundo
46.
irisado, misterioso
y profundo.)
47.
Fue tu barro
también un incensario
48.
Ante Xochiquetzal; más tu fervor
49.
católico, ciñó el escapulario
50.
y a la par desgranabas un rosario
51.
perfumado con ámbares de amor ...
52.
Tus júbilos
ingenuos sobre la pena están
53.
Cual sobre negro
lucen, ardientes y sencillas,
54.
Azules amapolas y
rojas “maravillas”
55.
Las jícaras que
bruñe Michoacán.
56.
Así en la laca nítida y brillante
57.
De tus cóncavos
versos turbadores
58.
Bebiendo el agua
zarca, entre flores,
59.
¡mira su propio rostro el caminante![47]
60.
To
evoke the missing poet, Tablada uses the same images
of local, popular, colourful objects used by Herrán in his paintings; demijohns of Guadalajara, the clay
of the censer, scapulars and the Rosary, blue poppies and the red “wonders”,
the burnished lacquer gourds of Michoacan. A visual culture shared by members
of this modernist generation (or of the Athenaeum), who certainly left the
table set for the artists of the next generation, the revolutionary one.
61.
Considering
that Anthropology and Art History as academic disciplines were consolidated in
the 19th century, it is not surprising that some of his objects of study
existed in a sort of crossfire, as unstable parts of the dichotomy Art /
artefact. In countries like Mexico, the consolidation of both Anthropology and
Archaeology in specialized institutions such as the National Museum allowed the
collection of these objects as well as their technical and formal analysis. The
assessment Mexican artists made of these objects, especially of the
wide-ranging pottery, did not happen unexpectedly with the avant-garde of the
twenties. As it can be seen in Herrán’s murals,
besides being decorative elements, pots acquire a particular symbolic value, a
specific localism. Otherwise, Herrán might have been
tempted to represent Greek vases, as Frank Brangwyn did in the two works that
we have seen, or the Mexican painter Alberto Fuster,
with his clear intention of evoking a classical western past.
62.
Meanwhile,
between two intellectual generations, Gerardo Murillo (best known as Dr. Atl) accomplished this interest in folk art or typical
industries in a catalogue of objects from different collections, many of which
belonging to the painter Roberto Montenegro. After 1922, the years of Orozco’s
so much deplored “jicarismo” would begin. The
eulogies for pots were over.
Bibliographic
references
CORTINA,
Leonor. La
loza mexicana del siglo XIX en los
museos de los Estados
Unidos, In: RAMÍREZ, FAUSTO (cord.). México en el Mundo de las Colecciones de arte, México
Moderno, Vol. 4, México: SRE/UNAM/CONACULTA, 1994.
COVEY, Arthur
Sinclair. Frank Brangwyn Exhibition room at Venice, The Studio:
International art, XXXIV, N. 146, may 1905, pp
285-286. Heidelberger historische Bestände-digital.
Available at: <http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/> Accessed on 10/3/2015.
CRAVIOTO, Alfonso, Crónica
oficial de las Fiestas del Centenario de la Independencia de México. México:
1911.
CURIEL, Gustavo. El ajuar doméstico tornaviaje, In:
VARGAS LUGO, Elisa (cord.). México en el Mundo de las Colecciones de arte, México
Moderno, Vol.3, México: SRE/UNAM/CONACULTA, 1994.
DOROTINSKY ALPERSTEIN, Deborah; GONZALEZ MELLO,
Renato (cord.), Encauzar
la mirada: arquitectura,
pedagogía e imágenes en México (1920-1950). México: UNAM Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 2010.
FLORES PALAFOX, Jesús;
MONTEÓN GONZÁLEZ, Humberto (dirs.). La ESIME en la historia de la enseñanza técnica. México: Instituto Politécnico
Nacional, 1993.
GARCÍA SAINZ, María Concepción; ALBERT, María
Ángeles. Exotismo y belleza de una cerámica, In: Artes de México, 1991, N. 14.
HUMBOLDT, Alejandro de. Ensayo político sobre el
reino de la Nueva España,
Libro tercero, chap. VIII, México, Purrúa, col. "Sepan cuantos...", 1991 (1822).
PÉREZ
MONROY, Julieta. La enseñanza del dibujo en la Escuela Nacional Preparatoria,
In: REYES,
Aurelio de los, (cord.). La
enseñanza del Arte.
México: UNAM, 2010.
Plan de
Estudios de la Escuela Nacional de Artes y Oficios
para Hombres. México: Talleres de la Escuela de Artes y Oficios, Exconvento de San
Lorenzo, 1907.
Prieto, Guillermo. Memorias
de mis tiempos. México: Editorial Porrúa, col. “Sepan cuantos…” N. 481, 2004 (1906 París-México).
RAMIREZ, Fausto. Saturnino Herrán: Pintor Mexicano (1887-1987). México: Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes, Secretaría de
Educación Pública, Programa Cultural de las Fronteras, 1987.
RAMÍREZ, Fausto. Crónica de
las artes plásticas en los años de López Velarde 1914-1921. México: UNAM, 1990.
RAMÍREZ, Fausto et. al. Pintura
y vida cotidiana en México, 1650-1950. México:
Fomento Cultural Banamex, 1999.
REYES, Aurelio de los, (cord.). La enseñanza del Arte. México:
UNAM, 2010.
SHMIDT, Claudia. Las Buenos Aires de Pío, In: MALOSETTI COSTA, Laura (ed.). Collivadino. Buenos Aires en
construcción. Buenos Aires: Asociación de
Amigos del Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes, 2013.
TABLADA, José Juan. Exvoto a López Velarde: Retablo a la Memoria de Ramón
López Velarde en México
A.D. MCMXXI R.I.P. In: De Coyoacán a la Quinta Avenida. José Juan Tablada, una antología general. México: Fondo
de Cultura Económica/UNAM/Fundación para las Letras Mexicanas, 2007.
VALLE, Arthur. A pintura
decorativa brasileira no início do século XX, In: CHRISTO, Maraliz
et.al. Coleções em Diálogo: Museu Mariano Procópio e
Pinacoteca de São Paulo. São Paulo: Pinacoteca do Estado, 2014. Avaiable at: <https://www.academia.edu/>.
Descanso, El Mundo
Ilustrado, May 30th, 1909.
La Secretaría de instrucción Pública ha
adquirido un cuadro de S. Herrán. Honrosa distinción a un alumno de Bellas Artes, El
Imparcial, México, June 15th, 1909. In: MOYSSEN,
Xavier. La crítica de arte en México 1896-1921. Tomo
I, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México-Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 1999.
______________________________
[1] Translation by Elena
O’Neill
[2] Dr. Deborah Dorotinsky Alperstein, researcher at the Institute of
Aesthetic Studies of the National Autonomous University of Mexico
(UNAM). This text is part of the project “Unfolding Art Histories in
Latin America”, Getty Research Project UERJ / UNAM / UNSAM 2012-2014.
[3] National School of Arts
and Crafts for Men (ENAOH), year 1910-1911. Dossier nº 3, “Auditorium of this School.-Office of the Department of Public Instruction,
allowing Mr. Saturnino Herrán’s
panneaux to decorate the mentioned hall”. Office of
the Secretary of State and the Office of Public
Instruction and Fine Arts, Section of Normal and Special Education, 4th Bureau,
nº. 516, File ESIME, fund ENAOH, year 1910-1911, National Polytechnic
Institute, Mexico. No folio number.
[4] National School of Arts
and Crafts for Men (ENAOH), year 1910 to 1911. Dossier nº 3, “Auditorium of
this School.-Office of the Department of Public
Instruction, allowing Mr. Saturnino Herrán’s panneaux to decorate the
mentioned hall”. Office of the Secretary of State and the Office of Public
Instruction and Fine Arts, nº 80. File ESIME, fund ENAOH, year 1910-1911,
National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico. No folio number.
[5] The documents of the
commission may confuse the reader as to whether or not
they were oil paintings on canvas glued to the wall. As indicated by the report
on the recovery of both paintings, made around 1980, these were oil paintings
on wall, on an even layer of plaster which was rescued by employing the
technique “stacco a masselo”,
that is, the whole paiting is removed with its entire
original substrate or support. The whole procedure of recovery is documented in
the archives of the National Center for Conservation and Artistic Heritage
Registry (CENCROPAM), Box 126, Dossier 181. See SERVIN VELÁZQUEZ,
Javier. Desprendimiento de los
murales al óleo del pintor
Saturnino Herrán, Cuadernos
de Arquitectura y Conservación
del patrimonio artístico.
Serie: Ensayos, Núm. 13, January
1981. México: Secretaría de Educación
Pública e Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes, p.54-59; López Orozco, Leticia (ed.). CENCROPAM 50 años
de conservación y registro del
patrimonio artístico mueble:
inicios, retos y desafíos.
México: CENCROPAM-INBA, 2014, p.228.
[6] RAMIREZ, Fausto. Saturnino
Herrán: Pintor Mexicano (1887-1987).
México: Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes/Secretaría
de Educación Pública/ Programa Cultural de las Fronteras, 1987, p.52. Ramirez is certainly an authority concerning Herrán’s
work. See also RAMIREZ, Fausto. Saturnino Herrán. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Colección de Arte, 1976.
[7] A.A.V.V. Artistas Europeos del siglo
XIX en México. México: Fomento Cultural Banamex, 1996; A.A.V.V.. Los
Pinceles de la Historia:
La Fabricación del Estado,
1864-1910. México: Museo Nacional de Arte, 2003. A.A.V.V. Catálogo comentado
del acervo del Museo
Nacional de Arte: pintura siglo XIX. México:
INBA-Museo Nacional de Arte y UNAM-Instituto de Investigaciones
Estéticas, 2002.
[8] GARCIA CUBAS, Antonio. Atlas geográfico estadístico e histórico de la república mexicana. México: J.M. Fernández de
Lara, 1858; GARCIA CUBAS, Antonio. Atlas pintoresco e histórico de los
Estados Unidos Mexicanos. México: Debray Sucesores
en México, 1885. RIVA PALACIO, Vicente (dir.). México
a través de los siglos.
5 volumes, México: Ballescá; Barcelona: Espasa, 1887-1889.
[9] MONTEÓN GONZÁLEZ,
Humberto. La historia de la ESIME en los
informes de sus directores, 1868-1959. Antología
documental. México: Instituto Politécnico
Nacional, 2013, p.31-50.
[10] National School of Arts
and Crafts for Men (ENAOH), year 1910-1911. Dossier nº 3, “Auditorium of this School.-Office of the Department of Public Instruction,
allowing Mr. Saturnino Herrán’s
panneaux to decorate the aforementioned hall”. Office
of the Secretary of State and the Office of Public Instruction and Fine Arts,
nº 80. File ESIME, fund ENAOH, year 1910-1911, National Polytechnic Institute,
Mexico. No folio number.
The ENAOH was then housed in the former convent of St.
Lazarus, Belisario Dominguez Street, in what is now the centre
for Continuing Education Unit Allende of the National Polytechnic Institute.
With this document, the date of completion of the murals, previously dated
between 1911 and 1914, is clarified.
[11] All the Offices
mentioned here are in the National Centre for Conservation and Artistic
Heritage Registry of the National Institute of Fine Arts (CENCROPAM) project
181; box 126. I appreciate the kindness of the staff of the Historical Archives
of the institution for allowing me to examine the file. Office 53,
INBA-National Conservation Centre of Artistic Works, the architect Luis Ortiz
Macedo, General Director of the National Institute of Fine Arts (INBA). In this
file the names of the mural paintings are registered as: Albañiles y Labores (Builders and Labour),
Oil on plaster-layered prepared wall, given measures 2.65 x 1.85 m. each.
[12] I was not able to
confirm whether the murals remained at the Museum of Aguascalientes between
1978 and 1992. The collection os the Museum counted
with the preparatory panels for these murals. In 1980 the IPN authorities
request the CNCOA to safeguard the mural paintings during the period of
refurbishment of the old ESIME building. In 1988 the IPN authorities wrote to
the CNCOA asking the whereabouts of the murals, and in 1992 the CNCOA
authorities answered declaring that they were still in Aguascalientes. The
murals were returned to IPN.
[13] Today they are on
display at the IPN National Library of Science and Technology, in Zacatenco.
[14] Both in “Labour” and “Allegory of Construction” we notice large
blocks of uncut stone. The symbolic value of these items as “something yet to
be worked”, i.e. raw material, could refer to the
emerging national soul as well as the promise of new men, new citizens. Some
might see in this a reference to the Masonic allusion of the apprentice or
initiated as a “rough stone”; however, I do not have documents of that time
saying that this was, without a doubt, the symbolic intent of the author.
[15] It is difficult to make
definitive statements about the intonation of both paintings as they were
removed after being exposed to weathering for many years, and
restored after being removed from the walls.
[16] Unknown author. “The
Department of Education has acquired a painting by S. Herrán.
Honourable distinction to a student of Fine Arts”, in
El Imparcial, Mexico, June 15th, 1909. In: MOYSSEN, Xavier. La
crítica de arte en México 1896-1921. Tomo I,
México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México-Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 1999,
p. 404.
[17] Unknown author.
“Leisure”, El Mundo Ilustrado, May
30th, 1909, p. 117. Curiously, they here changed the name of the work precisely
for its opposite - from “Labour” to “Leisure” -
disrupting the conceptual focus of the artist and revealing how the Mexican
bourgeoisie stereotyped workers, as members of a “lower” social class, as being
“lazy”.
[18] CRAVIOTO,
Alfonso. Crónica oficial de las Fiestas del Centenario
de la Independencia de
México. México 1911 pp. 240-259, quoted in
MOYSSEN, Xavier. La crítica de arte en México
1896-1921. Tomo I, México: Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México-Instituto de Investigaciones
Estéticas, 1999, p. 471. We must see what Fausto
Ramirez says about “Women selling pots” presenting a “starving mature woman”,
with which the artist subverts the edifying value of hard work and presents a
less friendly side of it. RAMIREZ,
Fausto. Saturnino Herrán: Pintor Mexicano
(1887-1987). p.17.
[19] RAMÍREZ, Op. cit.,
p.18.
[20] See this work at http://www.museoblaisten.com/v2008/hugePainting.asp?numID=191 (Accessed on 9/07/2015).
[21] Unknown
author. Plan de Estudios de la Escuela Nacional de Artes y Oficios
para Hombres. México: Talleres de la Escuela de Artes y Oficios, Exconvento de San
Lorenzo, 1907, p. 9.
[22] DOROTINSKY ALPERSTEIN,
Deborah and GONZALEZ MELLO, Renato (org). Encauzar la
mirada: arquitectura, pedagogía
e imágenes en México
(1920-1950). México: UNAM Instituto de Investigaciones
Estéticas, 2010.
[23] Raquel Tibol, quoted in RAMIREZ, Op. cit., p.16.
[24] Unknown
author. Plan de Estudios de la Escuela Nacional de Artes y Oficios
para Hombres. México: Talleres de la Escuela de Artes y Oficios, Exconvento de San
Lorenzo, 1907, pp. 3-4.
[25] In May 1868, Dr. Miguel
Hurtado held conversations for reforming the 1856 and 1857 School rules. In
1872, the first workshop of the School, ironworks, was
set in motion. In 1875 followed the workshops of “turning, locksmith,
carpentry, masonry, electroplating, printing, lithography, photolithography,
photography, pottery, smelting, decorative painting and sculpture and
electricity, among others”. FLORES PALAFOX, Jesús y MONTEÓN
GONZÁLEZ, Humberto (orgs.). La ESIME en la historia de la enseñanza técnica. México:
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 1993, p. 84.
[26] On similar Schools of
Arts and Crafts for Women, see ALVARADO, Ma. de Lourdes. La Escuela
de Artes y oficios para Mujeres.
In: DE LOS REYES, (coord). La enseñanza del Arte. México: UNAM, 2010, pp.167-188.
[27] It is an allegory
titled “Triumph of Science and Labour over Envy and
Ignorance”, commissioned for the top of the stairs of the Colegio Grande, with
which we are familiar thanks to a copy made by Juan de Mata Pacheco, today
found in the National Art Museum (MUNAL). In Mata Pacheco’s copy, Labour and Science are represented by two muses engaged in
their work; while Science manipulates a scientific instrument, the muse of Labour touches or even mixes or handles a liquid inside a
spherical glass container with what looks like a stripe, or a brush. Minerva,
the goddess of wisdom, reigns in the scene and a small cherub in the centre, sitting in the very foreground between the two
muses and at the foot of the goddess’ shield, with his index finger on his
lips, signalling silence. As Julieta Perez Monroy
explains, this sign is a proposal to silence words and dissenting voices raised
between factions in the National Preparatory School (ENP) during the general
student strike that year. PEREZ MONROY, Julieta. La
enseñanza del dibujo en la Escuela Nacional Preparatoria. In: DE LOS REYES,
Aurelio (coord.). La enseñanza del Arte. México: UNAM, 2010,
pp.144-145. The researcher ponders on the possibility of Mata
Pacheco altering the composition and that it is not exactly a true copy.
[28] SHMIDT, Claudia. Las Buenos Aires de Pío. In: MALOSETTI COSTA, Laura (ed.). Collivadino. Buenos Aires en
construcción. Buenos Aires: Asociación de
Amigos del Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes, 2013,
p.21.
[29] MALOSETTI, Op. cit.,
p.17.
[30] I thank Fernanda Pitta
for her generosity of bringing me pictures of the studies by Henrique Bernardelli; and also Arthur Valle
for sharing a digital version of the exhibition catalogue CHRISTO, Maraliz (et.al.). Coleções em Diálogo: Museu Mariano Procópio
e Pinacoteca de São Paulo. São Paulo: Pinacoteca do Estado, 2014; see the article of VALLE, Arthur. A pintura decorativa brasileira no início
do século XX, pp.180-194. Avaiable at: <https://www.academia.edu/>.
[31] CHRISTO, Op. cit.,
p.127.
[32] COVEY, A.S. Frank
Brangwyn Exhibition room at Venice, The Studio: International art,
XXXIV, No. 146, May 1905, pp. 285-286. Available at: Heidelberger historische Bestände - digital http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de
(Accessed on 10/02/2015).
[33] RAMIREZ, Op. cit.,
p.15.
[34] CORTINA, LEONOR. La loza mexicana del siglo XIX en los
museos de los Estados
Unidos. In: RAMÍREZ, FAUSTO (coord.). México en el Mundo de las Colecciones de arte, México Moderno, Vol.4,
México: SRE/UNAM/CONACULTA, 1994, p. 89.
[35] See the work in https://www.museodelprado.es/coleccion/obra-de-arte/las-meninas/9fdc7800-9ade-48b0-ab8b-edee94ea877f. Access
on 10/03/2015.
[36] CURIEL, Gustavo. El ajuar doméstico tornaviaje. In:
VARGASLUGO, Elisa (coord.). México en el Mundo de las Colecciones de arte, México Moderno, Vol.3,
México: SRE/UNAM/CONACULTA, 1994, pp.157-209. María Concepción
García Sainz and María
Ángeles Albert, Exotismo y belleza de una cerámica. In: Artes de México, 1991, nº 14,
p. 51.
[37] DE HUMBOLDT, Alejandro.
Ensayo político sobre el
reino de la Nueva España,
Libro tercero, cap. VIII
México, Purrúa, col. “Sepan
cuantos...”, 1991 (1822), p. 112. Preliminary study
by Juan Ortega y Medina.
[38] CURIEL, Gustavo and RUBIAL, Antonio. Los espejos de lo propio:
ritos públicos y usos privados en la
pintura virreinal. In: RAMÍREZ, Fausto, RUBIAL, Antonio, CURIEL Gustavo and
VELÁZQUEZ, Angélica. Pintura y vida cotidiana en
México, 1650-1950, México, Fomento Cultural Banamex, 1999, p.132.
[39] The work is available
at http://ceres.mcu.es/pages/Viewer?accion=4&AMuseo=MAM&Museo=MAM&Ninv=00237
Accessed on 10/07/2015.
[40] PRIETO, Guillermo. Memorias
de mis tiempos, México, Editorial Porrúa, col. “Sepan
cuantos…” nr. 481, 2004 (1906 Paris-Mexico), p. 36.
[41] See figure 3, available
at: http://www.dimensionantropologica.inah.gob.mx/?p=5584.
Accessed on 10/07/2015.
[42] Nicolas Leon was a
native of Michoacan. He is credited with the creation of the Michoacan Museum
and the Museum of Oaxaca, and then the Department of Physical Anthropology of
the National Museum in Mexico City. He collaborated with the physical
anthropologist of the American Museum of Natural History, Ales Hrdlika when he visited Mexico accompanying Carl Lumholtz in his travels in the northwest of the Republic in
the end of the 19th century.
[43] Rickards owned a mine
in the same state. He managed to publish in life a first work entitled The ruins of Mexico, highlighting the
importance of the antiquary theme. However, he left in type format a second
work written between 1904 and 1930 on the ethnic groups of the state of Oaxaca,
illustrated with photographs taken by him and other authors, which we assume he
collected throughout his life in Mexico. I am grateful to Fausto Ramirez for
introducing me to the granddaughter of Rickards in 2004, who showed me the part
of the family album and of the manuscript that remained in their hands. The
researcher died a couple of years ago and the whereabouts of the photographs is
unknown, but they have been deposited in digital format at the Manuel Toussaint
Photographic Archive of the Institute of Aesthetic Studies at UNAM.
[44] RAMÍREZ, Fausto. Crónica
de las artes plásticas en los años de López Velarde 1914-1921. México:
UNAM, 1990, p. 21.
[45] In fact, teacher Faust
explains, the exhibition was so successful that it was extended until June 6th,
well beyond the schedule.
[46] RAMÍREZ, Fausto. Saturnino
Herrán: Pintor Mexicano (1887-1987).
México: Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes/Secretaría
de Educación Pública/ Programa Cultural de las Fronteras, 1987, p. 11.
[47] TABLADA, José Juan. Exvoto a López Velarde: Retablo a la Memoria de Ramón
López Velarde en México
A.D. MCMXXI R.I.P. In: De Coyoacán ala Quinta
Avenida. José Juan Tablada, una antología general.
México: Fondo de Cultura Económica/UNAM/Fundación para las Letras
Mexicanas, 2007, p.124-125. An approximate and free
translation of this poem would be:
And your poetry
they called rare,
Emanating emotion
is like clear water
In bottles from
Guadalajara.
(Since with the
sweat from its mortal clay
The poet curdles
glass prisms
So the common people can see the sad world
Iridescent, mysterious and profound.)
Your clay was
also a censer
Before Xochiquetzal; but your Catholic fervour
Girded the
scapular
And recited your
rosary
Scented with the
amber of love…
Your naive joys
over the grief are
like they were
shining on black, burning and simple,
Blue poppies and
red “wonders”
The gourds
burnished by Michoacan.
So in the clear, bright lacquer
Of your concave
disturbing verses
Drinking light
blue water, among flowers,
The wayfarer
looks at his own face!