The
Ties between the University of
Pennsylvania and the Brazilian Architecture, through the Career of
George Henry Krug
Fernando Atique [1]
ATIQUE, Fernando. The Ties between the University of Pennsylvania and the Brazilian Architecture, through the Career of George Henry Krug. 19&20, Rio de Janeiro, v. IV, issue 1, jan. 2009. Acessible in: <http://www.dezenovevinte.net/arte%20decorativa/atique_krug_en.htm>. [Português]
*
* *
1.
Perhaps,
in the Brazilian society, there is not an American university so paradoxal like the University of Pennsylvania, also known,
simply by its acronym Penn. Although sheltering, until today, more than
200 Brazilian students[2], it is relegated to secondary
levels when the intention is to talk about the American academic scenery, even
being Penn one of the most prestigious educational institutions in the world.
In the architectural field, to find references about Penn is not one easy task,
because the data about this institution appear just in obituaries of architects
or in some footnotes of few academic articles, but never in a specific product
able to reveal the actors and the relations that linked Penn to Brazil. Because
of those aspects this article intents to be one contribution to illuminate this
blurred relationship.[3] In fact, this paper is a sistematization of some results of a doctoral dissertation
presented to the College of Architecture and Urbanism of the University of São Paulo (FAUUSP), in 2007. The main topic of this
article is the analyzis of the career of one alumnus
of the University of Pennsylvania, called George Henry Krug [Figure 1]: born in Brazil, trained in the
United States, and a famous worker in his homeland.
2.
The
focus is to present the contribution of this man to the construction of
institutions and the profession of architect in Brazil. One special aspect of
this paper is to delineate the importance of American references in those proccesses. More than to demolish one historiographical
weft in which we can see the importance of the European presence, the main
aspect of this paper is to show the niches where the American references could
raise in Brazil. In general words, the text sustain the thesis that the
profession of modern architect in Brazil was produced by the conjugation of
references between Europe, the American continent and, in special, the United
States, attesting the richness of the knowledge and its non-geographical
character. This aspect, per si, reveals one
important characteristic of the XIX century: the circulation of social actors
and the ideas to the construction of a Modern profession and a Modern city.
The
University of
Pennsylvania and the Architectural Education in the end of the XIX
Century
3.
Before
discussing the George Henry Krug career, it is important to analyzise
his educational background in the field of Architectre.
As consequence, we have to look to the United States for a moment. The
University of Pennsylvania occupies, since 1876, when the first Brazilian
enrolled there[4], an important place in the
education of a Brazilian elite. Better known, in Brazil, in three areas of
knowledge (Medicine, Business and Odontology)[5], the Penn legacy was also important
in areas as Engineering and Architecture.
4.
The
origin of this prestigious American university is the Academy and Charitable
School of Philadelphia, founded in 1740, by Benjamin Franklin. For some
historians, Penn is the first American university constituted without
interference or action of the Great Britain (THOMAS; BROWNLEE, 2000, p.23-26).
When the young Benjamin Franklin, born in Boston, arrived in Philadelphia, in
1723, the city was flourishing, in special because of its port, one important
place in the colonies in North America. Although important and dynamical in its
economical activities, the Education at Philadelphia was not so disseminated,
as observed by the historians George Thomas and David Brownlee in the book Building America’s First University: an historical and architectural guide for the University
of Pennsylvania. For
these authors, the ascendance of the Quakers in the foundation of the city, by
the action of William Penn, made a detachment between the religious life and
the constitution of schools, usually seen in the other English colonies in
America. This affirmation is sustained because the Quakers do not need the
temples or seminaries for the propagation of their credo[6]. As consequence, religious or
public schools were not built in Philadelphia until 1740, when Benjamin
Franklin founded the Charitable School and potentialized
the ways of acquiring formal education in Philadelphia (THOMAS; BROWNLEE, 2000,
p.23-26). In 1749, Benjamin Franklin published a pamphlet named Proposals for the Education of Youth in Pensilvania [sic], considered by the American
historians, the fisrt public declaration of the
necessity of formal educational for all people in the “New World”. David
Brownlee and George Thomas pointed out that the document, itself, and the
Academy and Charitable School of Philadelphia were the origin of the University
of Pennsylvania (THOMAS; BROWNLEE, 2000, p. XI).
5.
During
many years, the University of Pennsylvania was located at the ancient part of
the village; know as “Old City”. There, it was not so expressive in terms of
students or buildings, but the methods of education were famous. Until 1870 it
was the reality of Old Penn. But in that year occurred a challenge: the
University moved-in to the west part of Philadelphia, just across the
Schuylkill River, in a campus specially constructed to the development
of the institution. There, the university could grow in number of students and
of courses offered to the public (THOMAS; BROWNLEE, 2000: 54-55). In the decade
of 1880, Penn opened new Departments, such as, Philosophy, Architecture, Archaelogy and Paleontoly, and
started the Training School for Nurses, the Graduate Department to Women, the
Laboratory of Hygiene, the Hospital for Dogs, the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology and other
betterments (THE RECORD OF THE CLASS OF 1901, p.87).
6.
The
Penn’s educational expansion was followed by the construction of many
buildings, like the Library of the university, designed by the architect Frank
Furness, in Queen Anne Style; and the buildings of the Museum, the Dental Hall,
and the Law School etc. It is important to say something, in special, about the
Logan Hall and the College Hall buildings [Figure 2], designed and constructed by
Thomas Webb Richards, the fisrt “Professor of Drawing
and Architecture”at Penn (ARCHITECTURAL ALUMNI
SOCIETY, 1934, p.12).
7.
In
fact, the education on Architecture at the University of Pennsylvania started
in 1873 by the action of Thomas Webb Richards. This professor taught at Penn
following a peculiar modus operandi, as observed by Edwin Bateman
Morris, Penn’s alumnus and retired professor: “Mr
Richard all in all, appears to have been a person of considerable zeal and
devotion to the cause of Architecture, instilling into his pupils an
understanding of the principles of design as he understood them” (MORRIS,
1934, p. 12). At this time, the instructions on Architecture were offered into
the College, and “occurred during the last two years of a four
year course, the fisrt two being devoted to academic
studies - a sort of here’s-a-chance-to-change-your-mind period”(MORRIS,
1934, p.12). Without specific spaces to the architectural classes, the lessons
were ministrated inside the building know as College
Hall, adapted for it. This building, as seen, was dsigned
by Richards. As decorrency of this conncetion, the Richard’s buildings at the Penn West Campus
were pointed out as good exemplars of Architecture. Being the College Hall and
the Logan Hall buildings designed inside the aesthetic and the rules of the newgothic architecture, we can suppose that the historicism
and the eclecticism were adopted as common solutions for the academic jobs.
8.
The
School of Architecture, as an autonomous institution of the College was
inaugurated only in October 7th of 1890, under the direction of Theophilus P. Chandler, a local architect. In 1901, the maganize The
Architectural Record produced an inquiry about the American Schools
of Architecture and dedicated to Penn an extensive article. In this article,
the journalist Percy C. Stuart wrote about the origins of the Penn’s
Architectural School, presenting a new narrative about it, in which Thomas
Richard was not presented as the founder of the instructions on Architect there.
In any case, some publications, printed by the own University of Pennsylvania present
Richards as the first Architect actuating there. In addition, in the
Architectural Archives documentation about this first period is so hard to be
found. Whatever, we can affirm, by the juxtaposition of many sources that the
beginning of the instructions on Architecture at Penn had started in the decade
of 1870, and the number of graduate people was so small until the end of the
1890’s. We could realize, too, that the people interested in the Architectural
career could enroll to the course just proving their sufficiency in the lessons
ministrated during the two first years of the College.
It was a benefit, because being approved the candidate could reduce the time of
their graduation from four to two years.
9.
About
the methods of teaching, we could discover that the Britain Architectural was a
model to the lessons as well the buildings of the campus. Being the Old
Philadelphia a place constructed with brick masonry, we could see that this
technology was taught to the students as an adequated
solution (FOUNDATION FOR ARCHITECTURE, 1994, p.14).
10.
The
fact is that only in the 1890 the Penn School of Architecture was officially
founded. After this, the School had two ways of being in contact with the
career: by the bachelor degree, obtained after attending the four years course,
or by a short-term course, named Special Course in Architecture.
This last option just proved the certification of the students, not their
degree as architects. To be enrolled to this Special Course in Architecture,
the candidate had to prove their experience with the praxis of the
Architectural field (as draughtsman or builder, for example). The expected
public for this short-term course should was, also, candidates that had
attended a course in other schools around the world. If the student of the
Special Course wished, he could continue his studies in complementary courses,
as the Interior Architecture. For this compliment the student received
another diploma after two years (UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, CATALOGUE AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS, 1893-94, p.158). This information extracted of the announcements
published by Penn, suggest that the short-term courses ever occurred at this
university.
11.
Those
options of degrees into the School of Architecture of the University of
Pennsylvania must be seen as ways of economical maintence
of the institution. Being a private institution with a fixed amount of dollars repassed by the State, the University was dependent of the
payment of tuitions and fees from its students. In the other hand, we can
affirm that the variety of titles and courses maintened
by Penn could guarantee the improvement of the labor in the United States, a
country that experimented great economical and industrial development in the
XIX century. As another consequence, those courses, in special the short-term
models, attracted students over the world, in special, Brazilians that could
saw a way to save money, but to conserve the status of an American Diploma. In
the Architectural scenery, we can affirm, the Special Course was the most
attractive for Brazilians.
12.
The
School of Architecture was reformulated many times during its existence. Maybe,
the most famous and impressive changing had occurred in the fisrt
decade of the XX century, when the French architect Paul Philippe Cret was hired. Paul Cret was a
former student of the École Nationale de Beaux-Arts de Lyon,
France, graduated on 1901. In that same year he won the Grand-Prix de Paris,
one of the most important prizes in Europe, in the architectural field. The
employment of Paul Cret changed many things at the
School of Architecture, in special, because allowed Penn to start a Frenchsizing process verified in other American uiversities in the same period (GROSSMAN, 1996, p.XV).
13.
With
Cret, the Architectural education could be closer to
the Écoles de Beaux Arts, even if kepting the orginal American
model of teaching based on the pragmatism and the technicism.
14.
The
second important transformation occurred in the School of Architecture was the
change of its name. In 1920 it was changed from School of
Architecture to School of Fine Arts. More than an irrelevant
changing, this alteration could certify the intention to be closer of the École de Beaux Arts. Nevertheless it is
important to say that the new name could not transform the specific way of
education at this school. The architect at Penn, as well at other American
schools of Architecture, was divided into three: the Architect, the Urban
Designer and the Landscape Architect (KOYL, 1934,
p.10).
15.
The
architect Lucio Costa, when interviewed by Hugo Segawa,
in the 1980’s, pointed out that the difference between the Écoles
de Beaux Arts and the Fine Arts Schools must be in the mind of
the historians. For him, the École de Beaux
Arts intents to produce a global education on arts, instilling the
discovering about Great Arts and Minor Arts, in special. In the other hand, the
Fine Arts Schools focused just “the most fine arts”, showing a kind of
selection and the incorporation of the American pragmatical
way of action in the Architectural education. By this differentiation, we can
say that Penn, even having Paul Cret inside his
faculty, was a typical American School of Architecture.
16.
After this brief analyzis
of the Architectural instructions at University of Pennsylvania, we can present the
specific considerations about its fisrt Brazilian
Alumnus: George Henry Krug.
George
Henry Krug: A professional with a blurred trajectory in the historiography
17.
Known
in Brazil of the XIX century as Architect and Professor of the most important
educational institutions of that period, George Henry Krug is an enigma for the
Architectural historiography today. Sparse references to his biography and work
have widespread assumptions as historically verifiable facts, damaging the
understanding of their role in the Brazilian Architectural scenery of his time.
18.
Perhaps
the most significant example of ignorance about him is the confusion about his
nationality. As point out the few studies that focused his career, he was born
at Fresno, California. However, in fact, he was born in the Sao Paulo state,
as testified to his former student records filed in the University Archives and
Record Center of the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia. Born in
Campinas, an important city in the hinterland of São Paulo state, on December
03, 1860, George Henry Krug was son of Wilhelm Gustav Heinrich Krug, German,
and of Amely Catherine Bailey Krug, American
(UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES, FOLDER G. KRUG). His father was a constructor and member
of the Presbyterian Church in Campinas. Because of these two characteristics,
Wilhelm was chosen as the responsible for the construction of the Colégio Internacional,
in that city, an educational arm of the Presbyterian Church in the United
States, since 1873.
19.
It
is known that the family of George Henry Krug lived for some years in the
United States, probably in the East Coast before moving-out to Campinas,
Brazil, in the last quarter of the XIX century. In the beggining
of the XX century, Wilhelm Krug and his family moved from Campinas to São Paulo
City. The Krug family in the XIX century was known and important in Campinas,
what, in part, can explains the destination of Amely
and Wilhelm Krug, when they leaved the United States. By the crossing from
various sources, we could see that the German Wilhelm Krug, himself, emigrated
from Germany to the United States, where he took the name William, and
married Amely Bailey, coming after marriage, to
Brazil, as a result of the War of Secession, like many other American
immigrants. By one list about the American families that came to Brazil,
between 1865 and 1885, prepared by Betty Antunes de
Oliveira, we could found the Record of William Krug. Already in Brazil, the
couple had George Henry Krug and Arthur Gillum Krug
and, later, in 1889, in Taubaté, Bernard McDowell
Krug, the youngest son of the couple (UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE MEDICAL
SCOPE, 1914).
20.
In
the documents found in the United States, mainly in the files relating to
Alumni of Penn, we could not get much information about the career of George
Krug by the fact that, very rarely, he responded to surveys sent to former
students of the institution. However, something very important was the
discovery that the three Krug men studied at Penn. The first, according to
records found there, was George, who joined the College in 1883, as Special
Student in Architecture, turning off in 1885 (UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES, FOLDER
KRUG). Between 1884 and 1885, it was the turn of Arthur Krug to be enrolled in
the course of Civil Engineering (UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES, FOLDER A. KRUG), and in
1914, Bernard McDowell Krug was graduated in Medicine (UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, THE MEDICAL SCOPE, 1914).
21.
By
the presence of the three Krug brothers at the University of Pennsylvania we
can see that more than the retention of names like the mother’s land, the
family kept the idea that the United States was a special country to get
degrees.
22.
It
should be explained, however, that at the time that George Krug goes to Penn to
study architecture, São Paulo City did not have any course to enable this
practice. Even at the national scenery, only the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts,
in Rio de Janeiro, guarantee this training, but with little prestige (DURAND,
1989, p.98). The same happened with respect to his brother Arthur Gillum Krug, egress, in 1885, the Penn’s course of civil
engineering. In São Paulo the degrees in civil engineering would be offered
only in 1890 and 1896, respectively, in the Polytechnic School and the
Mackenzie College, which at least partly explains the search for this career
abroad.
23.
Even
with respect to the dispatch of these brothers to the United States, apart from
the question of being children of a North American with a German, this last
one, first rooted in the United States, and then in Brazil, is the fact that
his father was very close to the paulista elite,
which led the couple to follow the same practice that this social class. The paulista elite had the custom to stimulate its children to
be graduated in the United States, in special in Universities located in the
East Coast, like Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, and Penn (ATIQUE, 2007).
Knowing that Wilhelm Krug was the builder of the Colégio
Internacional in Campinas, and thereafter lived in
São Paulo, involving itself in the implementation of the Samaritan Hospital,
both works Presbyterians, is likely to have enrolled their children in such a
Protestant institutions.
24.
Although
the life history of George Henry Krug is important to be examined is, however,
their presence in the University of Pennsylvania that should be emphasized
here. In 1883, when docked in Philadelphia to attend Penn, the course of
architecture was taught in the College, under the responsibility of Professor
Thomas Webb Richards. As explained, George Krug attended not the conventional
graduation offered by this institution. He was enrolled in the Special Course,
explained above. It is important to say that this choice maybe was forced by
two circumstances: the first, in São Paulo there was not any Architectural
course able to graduate architects, and, in second place, we suppose that
George Krug was a kind of assistant of his father in the construction field, in
Brazil. To be enrolled in the Special Course at the University of Pennsylvania,
he was examined, taking into account its performance with his father, which
ensured approval. However, definitive source on this hypothesis has not been
found in their records as a student.
25.
The
Special Course attended by Krug had graduate only seven students until 1883,
the year he got his enrollment. In 1885, when he obtained the Certificate of
Proficiency in Architecture, he was the only student there in this modality.
Analyzing the oldest reference concerning to the establishment of
"instruction in architecture," the catalog of 1872, it was possible
to detect that Thomas Webb Richards taught “Drawing - Geometrical and Isometrical Drawing, and Drawing from the Flat. Free Hand
Sketching”, for Freshman Year, and “Drawing - Perspective Drawing.
Principles of Architecture. Shading in Indian Ink. Ornamental
Drawing”, for Sophomore Year inside the regular
program of the College. When the student started the specific career, as Civil
Engineering, Richards taught “Drawing - Use of the Scale and Protractor.
Water - colors. Graphical Representations from Geometry. Free Hand Sketching.
Ornamentation”, for the Freshman Year, and “Drawing - Isometric and
Linear Perspective. Graphical repreentations from
Descriptive Geometry. Ornamental Drawing. Landscap”, for
sophomores. The Junior and Senior Years of the Civil Engineering course had the
classes: “Drawing - Topographical Drawing. Roofs. Bridges”, e “Drawing -
Plans. Elevations. Sections.” The students also had “Descriptive
Geometry - Problems, including the Point, Right Line, and Plane”, and Descriptive
Geometry, based in “Pratical Problems.
Shades, Shadowsm and Perspective”, “Descriptive
Geometry - Application to Ground Plans. Elevations and Sections” (UNIVERSITY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1872:9-10,15-16).
26.
In
addition of these disciplines, all the students also receive compulsory
instruction in Theoretical Mechanics, Heating, Sound, Lighting, in German
Literature and Language, in English Literature, in Writing, History, Social
Science, Electricity, Astronomy and Physical Geography (UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, 1872, p.16).
27.
In
comparison with the Special Course in Architecture, offered by the School of
Architecture, after 1890, we can realize that the program of study for
certification of an architect in the early years at Penn,
was not very different from what would be formalized with the creation of the
School of Architecture, in 1890. Lack fell more on the contents of the history
of architecture, which, possibly, were taught at school practices, when the
reproduction of models in plaster, and the development of projects.
28.
With
the finish of the two-year course, George Krug came back to Brazil,[7] not as you think, Bachelor of
Architecture, but only Proficient in Architecture. This distinction was
to the architecture in the United States, as well as the work of
"practical in dentistry" was for the Brazilian dentists, until the
1960s. However, with the labor camp opened by his father in Brazil, Krug could
work with him, first, in Campinas, and then, in São Paulo. During his career,
sometimes he was called Architect, but also Engineer, what shows
an ordinary misunderstanding of the Brazilian society about the professions. If
the Engineer and the Architect were confounded in its professional tasks, a
Proficient in Architecture was the same of a Bachelor in Architecture in São Paulo
City, in the XIX century.
29.
In
São Paulo, father and son developed the project of the Evangelical Hospital,
then, called Samaritan Hospital, inaugurated on January 25, 1894, in the
current street Conselheiro Brotero,
in Higienópolis neighborhood. This building had
leaked its architecture within the compositional rules in use on the XIX
century. We can affirm that this bulding was
projected with part of the repertoire acquired by Krug in Penn: tripartite
façade with clear lines of symmetry and well demarcated volumes, windows topped
by frames and timpani. Also in the neighborhood of Higienópolis,
according Maria Cecilia Naclerio Homem,
the firm William Krug & Son built a cottage in "rustic
style" to Iran. G. Baumgardner[8], at Higienópolis
Avenue, 22. In addition, in the same neighborhood, they built two residences
for Martin Burchard, at Higienópolis
Avenue, 20, and at the Aracaju Street [Figure 3]. They built, too, the family house, in the
same neighborhood (HOMEM, 1981, p.79 - 80, 82-83). It is known that the
architectural production of George Krug was linked to the American programs and
aesthetics, as the frequent use of the Queen Anne Style, can attest.
30.
Krug
also worked for the architect Ramos de Azevedo, even
before of the organization of the Technical Office Ramos de Azevedo,
in 1907. Carlos Lemos says, in Ramos de Azevedo e seu Escritório, which
since 1886 George Krug helped Ramos de Azevedo in
developing their projects. This aid was a natural extension of the relationship
that his uncle - Samuele Malfatti
- and his father - Wilhelm Krug - already had with Ramos de Azevedo,
from Campinas (LEMOS, 1993, p.54). Their affairs in the office have not been
confirmed, but must have been the same as the others have did, as Victor Dubugras and Maximiliano Hehl: project development, producing of watercolors
perspectives, monitoring the implementation of works in details etc.
31.
The
researcher Heloisa Barbuy,
searching the processes for construction, reform and expansion of buildings of
the Historic Triangle of São Paulo, until 1914, realized some works made by the
firm William Krug & Son, and as only by George Krug. Among them are
the construction of the building for the Deutsche Bank in 1897, in Largo do Tesouro; the reform for the installation of another bank in
na Rua do Tesouro, in 1899; the remodeling the façade of the building
of the former number 45 of the Rua da Quitanda in 1909; the
construction of a building in Largo da Misericordia, in 1910, the construction and changes in the
old building located at the numbers, 22, 24 and 36 of the Rua
da Quitanda, between 1911
and 1914 (BARBUY, 2006, p. 259 - 285).
32.
Sylvia
Ficher reports, too, in his doctoral thesis, that in
1904, Krug and his father were selected and awarded the Silver Medal at the
International Exposition of Saint Louis, USA. The project presented, according
to this author, was a warehouse for the Engenho Victoria,
owned by E. Johnston & Co., following the Queen Anne-style simplified, and
built in San Carlos do Pinhal, today, the city of São
Carlos, in São Paulo state (FICHER,, 1989, p.108).
33.
George
Krug was, also, for some years, (1889-1902) Professor at the School of
Engineering of Mackenzie College, where he taught classes in the Department of
Architecture and Construction, function that he left after he entered to the
Polytechnic School of São Paulo in 1904. The start of his career at Polytechnic
School occurred by a public contest, solved by voting among members of the
Congregation of the school, which earned victory over already established names
such as Euclides da Cunha
and Regino Aragon, among others. In this event was
explicit the protection of Ramos de Azevedo about
George Krug, as showed in the article written by José Carlos Barreto de Santana (SANTANA, 1996, p.322).
34.
Krug
was substitute assistant professor of the 4th Section of Arts of the
Polytechnic School of Sao Paulo, until 1906, when he was transformed in
effective professor (FICHER, 1989). It is known that George Krug exercised the
function of resident inspector for the State University of New York - USNY - in
Mackenzie College, after they leave the faculty of engineering course in this
school. What we want to illuminate, however, is that Krug’s presence as
inspector was motivated by two circumstances: his proximity with the
Presbyterianism and with the Mackenzie College leaders, and, in special, their
condition of Alumnus of one American university (ATIQUE, 2007).
35.
However,
in addition to their functions of teaching, Krug maintained the firm founded by
his father until the death of his progenitor, 1907. Years later, around 1910,
he was associated with his former colleague in the office Ramos de Azevedo, and then its designer, Antonio Garcia Moya, transforming the nomenclature of the office from William
Krug & Son, for Krug, Moya & Co.
In this period they experienced some increase in the number of works. This
period included a major reform in Piracicabano School,
in 1914. This school was founded by the American congreationalist
missionary Martha Watts, in 1881. The main building of the School was made by
Antonio de Matheus Haussler, in 1884 (Available in: www.setur.piracicaba.sp.gov.br/.
Acessed on January 14th, 2007). The new façade was
designed to show elements of the architecture of the period after the War of
Secession, occurred in U.S., best known as Federal Style, and practiced in
Brazil in the fisrt decades of the XX century
(ATIQUE, 2007).
36.
From 1916, year that he assumed the
effective position as Professor at Polytechinic
School of São Paulo, Krug received the task of to be the responsible for the
São Paulo’s Cathedral
construction, since 1911 in charge of Maxiliano Hehl. Krug held this position until 1919, year of his
death.
37.
For
it seems, Krug never worked with his brother Arthur Krug, a civil engineer. The
presence of Arthur Krug in his firm occurred, according to Sylvia Ficher, only after the death of the holder of the office,
which became Krug, Moya & Malfatti,
and then only Moya & Malfatti (FICHER, 1989, p.109).
38.
It
is known that in 1920 Arthur Krug was one of the Directors of the American
Chamber of Commerce in Sao Paulo (UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES, FOLDER AG KRUG). It
seems that the involvement of his brother’s office must have occurred to settle
outstanding works until to find successor to the architectural work.
39.
George
Krug was uncle of Guilherme Malfatti
- an architect graduated by the São Paulo School of Fine Arts, in 1933 - and of
Anita Catarina Malfatti an important Brazilian Modern Painter. Krug was brother of the
mother of the two guys, Mrs. Eleonora Elizabeth Krug Malfatti. She was born, probably, in Brazil, in unknown
date and location. We know that Mackenzie College was chosen as the educational
institute for the two children, and we can suppose that it occurred in function
of the ties of George Krug with the Presbyterianism. Anita Malfatti
was supported by his uncle George Krug after her father’s dead, the Italian
constructor Samuele Malfatti.
The attitude of patrons of George Krug led Anita Malfatti
to study in Germany, in 1910, and, after, at the Independent School of Art in
New York, between 1914 and 1916. Involved with the Modern Art, she displeased
her uncle, but kept her envolviment with the
modernist precepts. Guilherme Malfatti
became, first, heir to the office of the uncle, and only then, chooses to be
graduated in architecture.
40.
In the field of the professional regulamentation of the Architect in Brazil, Krug took part
at the Society of Architects of São Paulo (Sociedade de Arquitetos de São Paulo), founded in
1911. He was, also, member of the Institute of Engineering (Instituto de Engenharia), organized in 1917, inside
the Polytechnic School of São Paulo, as point professor Carlos Lemos (LEMOS, 1993, p.83).
41.
George Krug passed away in São Paulo City, in
1919.
Concluding
42.
The
trajectory of George Henry Krug shows the need to look at the history of the
profession of architect in Brazil from other point of view. Character who
played major role in the management of educational institutions, and in the
design of important buildings, it is strange to note that his contribution to
the development of the country has been minimized in manuals of Architectural
history produced in the country.
43.
Connected
to an ethnic group that is little explored in Brazilian history - the
Anglo-Saxons - and part of a religious stronghold never investigated in their
spatial arrangement - the historic Protestants - Krug shows that there are historiographical niches to be search.
44.
This
paper, which is an excerpt from the doctoral thesis defended at the College of
Architecture and Urbanism of the University of São
Paulo (FAUUSP) tried to show the contribution of the University of Pennsylvania
in the process of modernization in Brazil, seen as one that provided training
in careers that the country yet, timidly, had. In a way, the survey started,
here, by way of George Krug, fits in well with other professionals, which,
strangely, were known even before the research done, in situ, in Penn. We
hope that professionals as George Henry Krug can find places inside the books
about the Brazilian Architecture; helping to reveal the multiplicity of options
and ideals that made Brazil a differente country in
the turn of the centuries.
References
ATIQUE,
Fernando. Arquitetando a ‘Boa Vizinhança’: a sociedade urbana do Brasil
e a recepção do mundo norte-americano, 1876 - 1945. (Tese de Doutorado). São
Paulo: Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, 2007.
BARBUY,
Heloísa. A cidade-exposição: comércio e cosmopolitismo em São Paulo,
1860 - 1914. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2006.
CAVALCANTI,
Lauro. As preocupações do belo: arquitetura moderna brasileira nos anos
30 e 40. Rio de Janeiro: Taurus, 1995.
DURAND,
José Carlos. Arte, privilégio e distinção: artes plásticas, arquitetura
e classe dirigente no Brasil, 1855 / 1985. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1989.
FICHER,
Sylvia. Ensino e profissão: o curso de engenheiro-arquiteto da
Escola Politécnica de São Paulo. (Tese de doutorado). São Paulo: Programa de
Pós-Graduação em História, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas,
Universidade de São Paulo, 1989. 2v.
FOUNDATION for Architecture. Philadelphia
Architecture: a guide to the city. Philadelphia: Duke & Company,
1994.
GROSSMAN, Elizabeth Greenwell. The civic
architecture of Paul Cret. New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1996.
HOMEM,
Maria Cecília Naclério. Higienópolis: grandeza
e decadência de um bairro paulistano. São Paulo: Prefeitura do Muncipío de São Paulo / Secretaria Municipal de Cultura,
1981. (Série história dos bairros de São Paulo, v. 17).
KOYL, George
Simpson. In: Architectural Alumni Society. Book
of the School. Department of Architecture, University of
Pennsylvania, 1874-1934. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.
LEMOS, Carlos Alberto Cerqueira. Ramos de Azevedo e seu escritório. São
Paulo: Pini / Lix da Cunha, 1993.
MORRIS, Edwin Bateman. History
of the School. In: ARCHITECTURAL ALUMNI SOCIETY. Book
of the School. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.
SANTANA, José Carlos Barreto de. Euclides da Cunha e a Escola
Politécnica de São Paulo. Estudos Avançados. São Paulo: n.26, v.10,
1996. p.311-327.
SECRETARIA
DE TURISMO DE PIRACICABA. Bens tombados no município.
THE
ARCHITECTURAL RECORD. Architectural
Schools in the United States: University of Pennsylvania - n. 2. New York: v.
10, p.314-335, mar. 1901.
THOMAS, George E.; BROWNLEE, David B. Building
America’s First University: an historical and
architectural guide to the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. Alumni
Directory: 1998. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1998. v.1-2.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. Architectural Alumni Society. Book of
the School. Department of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania,
1874-1934. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. Catalogue
and Announcements: 1893-1894 - The College. Philadelphia: Penn Press, 1894.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. Special announcement of the organization and courses of study of
the new Department of Science to be opened September, 1872.
Philadelphia: Collins Printer, 1872.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. The
Medical Scope: Record of the Class of Nineteen Fourteen. Philadelphia:
The Senior Class of The School of Medicine, 1914.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. The Record of the Class of 1901. Philadelphia: The
Senior Class of the College, 1901.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. University Archives and Record Center. Folder
G.H. Krug.
____________________________
[1] Fernando Atique,
is graduated on Architecture and Urbanism (1999) and holds a Master Degree on Architctural History (2002) by the Department of
Architecture and Urbanism of the University of São Paulo. He is, also, Phd by the College of Architecture and Urbanism of the
University of São Paulo (2007). Now, he is Professor and Coordinator of the
undergraduate courses on Architeture and Urbanism at
University São Francisco - Itatiba / SP. In 2006 he
was a Visiting Scholar at University of Pennsylvania, in the US, searching
professionals like George Henry Krug, discussed in this paper.
[2] Between 1876
and 1900 the number of Brazilian students at Penn was 43. They were enrolled in
different courses there. Between 1901 and 1950, 65 students from Brazil could
be counted. The total of Brazilians from 1876 to 1950 was 108 people (ATIQUE,
2006). After the 1950 until 1998, as point out the Alumni Directory
(1998), the Brazilians at Penn could raise 200 people. Brazilians linked with
the Architectural courses ministrated at Penn were 6
(ATIQUE, 2007).
[3] This article
is product of the research made in situ, in the first semester of
2006, by the grant of the Brazilian Federal Agency named CAPES.
[4] The fisrt Brazilian alumnus of Penn was Bernardo de Souza
Franco Harrah, born at Rio de Janeiro City. He enrolled the Law School in 1876.
[5] The
Brazilian ties with Odontology, Business and Medicine
were realized during the research in situ. More information can be find in my Doctoral Thesis.
[6] The Quakers,
until today, use specific spaces called The Quakers Meeting Houses for
their monthly meeting.
[7] During his
stay at Philadelphia, George Henry Krug enjoyed the fraternity Chi Phi,
Nu Section.
[8] Ira Baumgarnder was a Penn’s alumnus too. In São Paulo City he was known as the “American Dentisty”
(ATIQUE, 2007).